Things That Are Old: Old People Saying, "Back in the Day..."

I never wanted to write or otherwise reference my fantasy football teams, drafts, or really anything unless it was to persons that either (a) directly ask me, or (b) are in my league(s). However, as I went through a fantasy draft, and have another one coming up, I realized that my self-imposed boycott of anything NFL while the lock out was active resulted in me knowing less then I ever have about the NFL. It also made me realize how much I liked paying attention to football with my constantly-waning free time. My friends and I have conducted our drafts live for at least 9 years. After every draft, a few of the owners stay around to analyze (make fun of) each person's team and picks. This year's consensus team that had a questionable draft: my buddy Jason, who draft Chris Johnson and Peyton Manning in the first three rounds.

Normally, I would never criticize these picks, but when we drafted, Chris Johnson was holding out for a better contract, and Peyton Manning may or may not have an early-season (if not longer) threatening injury that no one outside of the Colts (and possibly only a few Colts) are aware of. Team Jason's success pretty much depends entirely on the performance of these two players. Jason is now secure in in Chris Johnson taking the field, and Chris Johnson will be a very rich man when that happens having recently signed a $53 million dollar contract, with $30 million reportedly guaranteed. Hold-outs like Johnson have been the ire of NFL and individual team fans for years. Apparently, Johnson's hold out resulted in a Twitter-storm of hate between the speedy back and his fans. All that aside, the general view on hold-outs is that they are greedy, individual-first players. This view is apparently not limited to NFL fans, but former NFL players, as well.

This morning on Paul Allen's show, former Viking great and NFL Hall-of-Famer Paul Krause discussed several things NFL with KFAN. I generally listen to KFAN in the background while doing work, and one of Krause's comments caused me to pay greater attention. The comment, in summary, indicated that players today do not think of the team and only think of individual reward and glory, while players of Krause's generation competed for the team first. Krause asserted that only a handful of players in today's game are an exception (with PA supporting Chad Greenway for this proposition). While I am not fan of contract hold-outs for higher pay, I find these comments by old-time players completely ridiculous. Didn't players of Krause's time and that of NFL generations after his fight for precisely the type of rights that players like Johnson use to leverage negotiations to this day? This would be like Obama complaining about his government-backed insurance coverage in 2030. It is my understanding that the owners held much more leverage over the players of Krause's generation to keep and hold the players to lower contracts to the point where players competed in tug-of-war competitions just to make more money. Again, players of those generations fought to make sure players of future generations had the right to take actions like demand more money or hold-out on current contracts.

I am willing to bet that if we could hop in a DeLorean equipped with a flux capacitor, pump 1.21 gigawatts into it, travel back in time and make immediate changes to the rules, these team-first old-timers would be hall-of-fame hold-outs.